Seat Ibiza 1999 vs Volkswagen Polo 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.9 | 1.2 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 180 HP | 55 - 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 116 - 235 NM | 106 - 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 - 16 seconds | 10.7 - 17.5 seconds | |
| In general, Seat Ibiza are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Volkswagen Polo. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 - 8.4 | 4.5 - 7.4 | |
|
Seat Ibiza petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Polo. On average, Seat Ibiza equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 3.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Seat Ibiza is smaller. Seat Ibiza is 2 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Polo, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Ibiza is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 270 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
785 litres | 1030 litres | |
| Seat Ibiza has 20 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 245 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`507 kg | ~ 1`530 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`048 kg | ~ 999 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 459 kg | ~ 531 kg | |
| Seat Ibiza load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 16 procentiem less than Volkswagen Polo. Therefore, Volkswagen Polo is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |