Seat Ibiza 2006 vs Volvo V40 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.9 | 1.5 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 64 - 180 HP | 120 - 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 112 - 330 NM | 220 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 - 15.6 seconds | 6.3 - 10.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 - 7.9 | 3.4 - 5.9 | |
|
Seat Ibiza petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo V40. On average, Seat Ibiza equipped with diesel engines consume 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.95 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Seat Ibiza is smaller, but slightly higher. Seat Ibiza is 42 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, 10 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 267 litres | 335 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1030 litres | 1500 litres | |
|
Volvo V40 has more luggage space. Seat Ibiza has 68 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V40. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo V40 (by 470 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volvo V40. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`614 | ~ 1`978 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |