Seat Ibiza 2010 vs Volkswagen Polo 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 | 1.2 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 105 HP | 60 - 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 108 - 250 NM | 108 - 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 - 16.7 seconds | 6.9 - 16.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.4 - 5.9 | 3.3 - 5.9 | |
|
Seat Ibiza petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Polo. On average, a Seat Ibiza with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Volkswagen Polo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.23 m | 3.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Seat Ibiza is larger, but slightly lower. Seat Ibiza is 26 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 1 cm wider, while the height of Seat Ibiza is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 280 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
430 litres | 952 litres | |
| Seat Ibiza has 150 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 522 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`603 | ~ 1`597 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volkswagen Polo is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |