Seat Ibiza 2012 vs Suzuki Swift 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
| Seat Ibiza is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Suzuki Swift is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel) | 1.2 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 150 HP | 94 HP | |
| Torque: | 108 - 250 NM | 118 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 - 16.7 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.4 - 5.9 | 5.0 | |
|
Seat Ibiza petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Suzuki Swift. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.23 m | 3.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.51 m | |
| Seat Ibiza is 38 cm longer than the Suzuki Swift, width is practically the same , while the height of Seat Ibiza is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 204 litres | |
|
Seat Ibiza has more luggage capacity. Seat Ibiza has 226 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Swift. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.9 metres more than that of the Suzuki Swift, which means Seat Ibiza can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`645 | ~ 1`480 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Suzuki Swift is better rated in child safety tests. The Suzuki Swift scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Suzuki Swift has
| |