Seat Ibiza 2012 vs Skoda Fabia 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 | 1.2 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 150 HP | 60 - 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 108 - 250 NM | 108 - 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 - 16.7 seconds | 7.3 - 16.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.4 - 5.9 | 3.8 - 6.2 | |
|
Seat Ibiza petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Skoda Fabia. On average, Seat Ibiza equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.23 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.50 m | |
| Seat Ibiza is 2 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, 5 cm wider, while the height of Seat Ibiza is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 480 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage space. Seat Ibiza has 50 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.5 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Seat Ibiza can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`645 | ~ 1`630 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Skoda Fabia is better rated in child safety tests. The Skoda Fabia scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |