Seat Ibiza 2012 vs Kia RIO 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 | 1.1 - 1.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 150 HP | 75 - 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 108 - 250 NM | 121 - 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 - 16.7 seconds | 11.5 - 15.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.4 - 5.9 | 3.2 - 6.3 | |
|
On average, the Seat Ibiza petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Kia RIO. On average, Seat Ibiza equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia RIO. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.23 m | 4.05 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.46 m | |
| Seat Ibiza is 18 cm longer than the Kia RIO, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Ibiza is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 224 litres | |
|
Seat Ibiza has more luggage capacity. Seat Ibiza has 206 litres more trunk space than the Kia RIO. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`645 | ~ 1`624 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Kia RIO is better rated in child safety tests. The Kia RIO scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Kia RIO has
| |