Seat Ibiza 2002 vs Volkswagen Polo 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 2.0 | 1.2 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 64 - 150 HP | 55 - 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 112 - 310 NM | 106 - 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 - 17 seconds | 10.7 - 17.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 - 7.9 | 4.5 - 7.4 | |
|
Seat Ibiza petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Polo. On average, Seat Ibiza equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.95 m | 3.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Seat Ibiza is larger, but slightly lower. Seat Ibiza is 5 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 5 cm wider, while the height of Seat Ibiza is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 265 litres | 270 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1030 litres | 1030 litres | |
| Seat Ibiza has 5 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`648 | ~ 1`530 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |