Seat Ibiza 2008 vs Skoda Fabia 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 2.0 | 1.2 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 70 - 150 HP | 60 - 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 112 - 320 NM | 108 - 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 - 15 seconds | 7.3 - 16.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.4 - 6.6 | 3.8 - 7.5 | |
|
Seat Ibiza petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Skoda Fabia. On average, Seat Ibiza equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.05 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Seat Ibiza is larger, but lower. Seat Ibiza is 5 cm longer than the Skoda Fabia, 5 cm wider, while the height of Seat Ibiza is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 292 litres | 315 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
938 litres | no data | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Seat Ibiza has 23 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. This could mean that the Seat Ibiza uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`604 | ~ 1`626 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |