Seat Ibiza 2012 vs Volvo C30 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel, lPG) | 1.6 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 150 HP | 100 - 230 HP | |
| Torque: | 108 - 320 NM | 150 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 - 15.9 seconds | 6.7 - 11.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.4 - 6.0 | 4.9 - 9.4 | |
|
Seat Ibiza petrol engines consumes on average 3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo C30. On average, Seat Ibiza equipped with diesel engines consume 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C30. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.05 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Seat Ibiza is smaller. Seat Ibiza is 20 cm shorter than the Volvo C30, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Ibiza is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 292 litres | 251 litres | |
|
Seat Ibiza has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Seat Ibiza has 41 litres more trunk space than the Volvo C30. The Volvo C30 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo C30. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`606 | ~ 1`816 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Volvo C30 has
| |