Seat Ibiza 2017 vs Skoda Fabia 2018
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel) | 1.0 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 65 - 150 HP | 75 - 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 93 - 250 NM | 95 - 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 - 15.2 seconds | 9.6 - 14.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 - 6.0 | 4.6 - 4.8 | |
|
Seat Ibiza petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Skoda Fabia. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.06 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Seat Ibiza is larger, but slightly lower. Seat Ibiza is 6 cm longer than the Skoda Fabia, 5 cm wider, while the height of Seat Ibiza is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 355 litres | 330 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1165 litres | no data | |
|
Seat Ibiza has more luggage capacity. Seat Ibiza has 25 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.8 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Seat Ibiza can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`674 | ~ 1`581 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Skoda Fabia is better rated in child safety tests. The Skoda Fabia scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 13 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |