Seat Exeo 2009 vs Volvo S60 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Seat Exeo) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Volvo S60) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 148 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Volvo S60 is a more dynamic driving. Seat Exeo engine produces 61 HP less power than Volvo S60, whereas torque is 252 NM less than Volvo S60. Due to the lower power, Seat Exeo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 5.9 | |
|
The Volvo S60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Exeo consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Exeo could require 240 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
| 1200 km on highway | 1470 km on highway | ||
| Volvo S60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.48 m | |
| Seat Exeo is 3 cm longer than the Volvo S60, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Exeo is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 380 litres | |
|
Seat Exeo has more luggage capacity. Seat Exeo has 80 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Exeo is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo S60. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`870 | 2`110 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Volvo S60 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Exeo has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Volvo S60, so Volvo S60 quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Exeo has
|
Volvo S60 has
| |