Seat Exeo 2009 vs Volvo S60 2004

 
Seat Exeo
2009 - 2012
Volvo S60
2004 - 2009
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 102 HP180 HP
Torque: 148 NM240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.6 seconds8.8 seconds
Volvo S60 is a more dynamic driving.
Seat Exeo engine produces 78 HP less power than Volvo S60, whereas torque is 92 NM less than Volvo S60. Due to the lower power, Seat Exeo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.59.2
The Seat Exeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Seat Exeo consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that by driving the Seat Exeo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 930 km in combined cycle760 km in combined cycle
1200 km on highway980 km on highway
Seat Exeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.66 m4.58 m
Width: 1.77 m1.80 m
Height: 1.43 m1.43 m
Both cars are similar in size. Seat Exeo is 8 cm longer than the Volvo S60, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 460 litres424 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1034 litres
Seat Exeo has more luggage capacity.
Seat Exeo has 36 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60.
Turning diameter: 11.2 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Exeo is 0.2 metres more than that of the Volvo S60.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8702`010
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 46002600
Pros and Cons: Seat Exeo has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Volvo S60 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv