Seat Exeo 2012 vs SAAB 9-3 2010
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 210 HP | 175 HP | |
Torque: | 320 NM | 265 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.1 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
Seat Exeo is more dynamic to drive. Seat Exeo engine produces 35 HP more power than SAAB 9-3, whereas torque is 55 NM more than SAAB 9-3. Thanks to more power Seat Exeo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 7.4 | |
The Seat Exeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Exeo consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-3, which means that by driving the Seat Exeo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 58 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
1320 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
Seat Exeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.66 m | 4.65 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.45 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Seat Exeo is 1 cm longer than the SAAB 9-3, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Exeo is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 425 litres | |
Seat Exeo has more luggage capacity. Seat Exeo has 35 litres more trunk space than the SAAB 9-3. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Seat Exeo is 0.4 metres more than that of the SAAB 9-3. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`990 | 1`980 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | 4400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Exeo has
|
| |