Seat Exeo 2012 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2012
| Body: | Sedan | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 210 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 197 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.1 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Seat Exeo engine produces 60 HP more power than Mitsubishi ASX, whereas torque is 123 NM more than Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 7.9 | |
|
The Seat Exeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Exeo consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that by driving the Seat Exeo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 1320 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| Seat Exeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Seat Exeo is larger, but lower. Seat Exeo is 37 cm longer than the Mitsubishi ASX, width is practically the same , while the height of Seat Exeo is 20 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 384 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1219 litres | |
|
Seat Exeo has more luggage capacity. Seat Exeo has 76 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Exeo is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi ASX, which means Seat Exeo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`990 | 1`970 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Exeo has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Exeo has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |