Seat Exeo 2012 vs Mazda 3 2019
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 210 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 213 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.1 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
Seat Exeo is more dynamic to drive. Seat Exeo engine produces 88 HP more power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 107 NM more than Mazda 3. Thanks to more power Seat Exeo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.1 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Exeo consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Exeo could require 270 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Exeo consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1320 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Exeo and Mazda 3 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 450 litres | |
| Seat Exeo has 10 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`990 | 1`869 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 14 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Exeo has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |