Seat Exeo 2012 vs SAAB 9-3 2010

 
Seat Exeo
2012 -
SAAB 9-3
2010 - 2011
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 200 HP175 HP
Torque: 280 NM265 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.3 seconds9.7 seconds
Seat Exeo is more dynamic to drive.
Seat Exeo engine produces 25 HP more power than SAAB 9-3, whereas torque is 15 NM more than SAAB 9-3. Thanks to more power Seat Exeo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.79.0
The Seat Exeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Seat Exeo consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-3, which means that by driving the Seat Exeo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres58 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 900 km in combined cycle640 km in combined cycle
1160 km on highway860 km on highway
Seat Exeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.66 m4.65 m
Width: 1.77 m1.80 m
Height: 1.43 m1.45 m
Both cars are similar in size. Seat Exeo is 1 cm longer than the SAAB 9-3, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Exeo is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 460 litres425 litres
Seat Exeo has more luggage capacity.
Seat Exeo has 35 litres more trunk space than the SAAB 9-3.
Turning diameter: 11.2 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Exeo is 0.4 metres more than that of the SAAB 9-3.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0151`980
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average
no data
Average price (€): no data4400
Pros and Cons: Seat Exeo has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv