Seat Exeo 2012 vs SAAB 9-3 2010
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 200 HP | 175 HP | |
Torque: | 280 NM | 265 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
Seat Exeo is more dynamic to drive. Seat Exeo engine produces 25 HP more power than SAAB 9-3, whereas torque is 15 NM more than SAAB 9-3. Thanks to more power Seat Exeo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 9.0 | |
The Seat Exeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Exeo consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-3, which means that by driving the Seat Exeo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 58 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
1160 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
Seat Exeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.66 m | 4.65 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.45 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Seat Exeo is 1 cm longer than the SAAB 9-3, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Exeo is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 425 litres | |
Seat Exeo has more luggage capacity. Seat Exeo has 35 litres more trunk space than the SAAB 9-3. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Seat Exeo is 0.4 metres more than that of the SAAB 9-3. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`015 | 1`980 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | 4400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Exeo has
|
| |