Seat Exeo 2012 vs Mitsubishi Galant 1997

 
Seat Exeo
2012 -
Mitsubishi Galant
1997 - 2003
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 200 HP136 HP
Torque: 280 NM178 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.3 seconds11.9 seconds
Seat Exeo is more dynamic to drive.
Seat Exeo engine produces 64 HP more power than Mitsubishi Galant, whereas torque is 102 NM more than Mitsubishi Galant. Thanks to more power Seat Exeo reaches 100 km/h speed 4.6 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.79.4
The Seat Exeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Seat Exeo consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Galant, which means that by driving the Seat Exeo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres64 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 900 km in combined cycle680 km in combined cycle
1160 km on highway870 km on highway
Seat Exeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.66 m4.63 m
Width: 1.77 m1.74 m
Height: 1.43 m1.42 m
Both cars are similar in size. Seat Exeo is 3 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Galant, 3 cm wider, while the height of Seat Exeo is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 460 litres470 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1400 litres
Despite its longer length, Seat Exeo has 10 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Galant. This could mean that the Seat Exeo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 11.2 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Exeo is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Galant.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0151`850
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): no data2000
Pros and Cons: Seat Exeo has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv