Seat Exeo 2012 vs Chevrolet Epica 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 141 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Seat Exeo is more dynamic to drive. Seat Exeo engine produces 59 HP more power than Chevrolet Epica, whereas torque is 85 NM more than Chevrolet Epica. Thanks to more power Seat Exeo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 8.2 | |
|
The Seat Exeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Exeo consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Epica, which means that by driving the Seat Exeo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 1160 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| Seat Exeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Seat Exeo is smaller. Seat Exeo is 14 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Epica, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Exeo is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 480 litres | |
| Seat Exeo has 20 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Epica. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Exeo is 0.4 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Epica. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`015 | 1`985 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Exeo has
|
| |