Seat Exeo 2012 vs Skoda Rapid 2017

 
Seat Exeo
2012 -
Skoda Rapid
2017 -
Body: SedanHatchback
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel1.6 Diesel

Performance

Power: 170 HP116 HP
Torque: 350 NM250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.4 seconds9.9 seconds
Seat Exeo is more dynamic to drive.
Seat Exeo engine produces 54 HP more power than Skoda Rapid, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Skoda Rapid. Thanks to more power Seat Exeo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.44.1
The Skoda Rapid is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Seat Exeo consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Rapid, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Exeo could require 195 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1290 km in combined cycle1340 km in combined cycle
1590 km on highway1410 km on highway
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.66 m4.30 m
Width: 1.77 m1.71 m
Height: 1.43 m1.46 m
Seat Exeo is larger, but slightly lower.
Seat Exeo is 36 cm longer than the Skoda Rapid, 7 cm wider, while the height of Seat Exeo is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 460 litres415 litres
Seat Exeo has more luggage capacity.
Seat Exeo has 45 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Rapid.
Turning diameter: 11.2 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): 2`0151`750
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): no data7800
Pros and Cons: Seat Exeo has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Skoda Rapid has
  • lower fuel consumption
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv