Seat Exeo 2012 vs Mazda 3 2019

 
Seat Exeo
2012 -
Mazda 3
2019 -
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel1.8 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 170 HP116 HP
Torque: 350 NM270 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.4 seconds10.3 seconds
Seat Exeo is more dynamic to drive.
Seat Exeo engine produces 54 HP more power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Mazda 3. Thanks to more power Seat Exeo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.4no data
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres51 litres

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 460'000 km360'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Seat Exeo engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 5 years6 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Audi A4, Seat Altea, Audi A5, Audi Q5, Seat LeonUsed only for this car
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Seat Exeo might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.66 m4.66 m
Width: 1.77 m1.80 m
Height: 1.43 m1.44 m
Both cars are similar in size. Seat Exeo and Mazda 3 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 460 litres450 litres
Seat Exeo has 10 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3.
Turning diameter: 11.2 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): 2`0151`894
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

low
Average price (€): no data14 800
Pros and Cons: Seat Exeo has
  • timing belt engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • fewer faults
Mazda 3 has
  • timing chain engine
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv