Seat Exeo 2012 vs Mitsubishi Galant 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 202 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
|
Seat Exeo is more dynamic to drive. Seat Exeo engine produces 53 HP more power than Mitsubishi Galant, whereas torque is 118 NM more than Mitsubishi Galant. Thanks to more power Seat Exeo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 7.0 | |
|
The Seat Exeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Exeo consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Galant, which means that by driving the Seat Exeo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1270 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 1520 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
| Seat Exeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Exeo is 3 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Galant, 3 cm wider, while the height of Seat Exeo is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1400 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Seat Exeo has 10 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Galant. This could mean that the Seat Exeo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Exeo is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Galant. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`030 | 1`870 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Exeo has
|
| |