Seat Exeo 2012 vs Mazda 3 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
|
Seat Exeo is more dynamic to drive. Seat Exeo engine produces 27 HP more power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Mazda 3. Thanks to more power Seat Exeo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 4.6 | |
|
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Exeo consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Exeo could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1270 km in combined cycle | 1100 km in combined cycle | |
| 1520 km on highway | 1210 km on highway | ||
| Seat Exeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Exeo and Mazda 3 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 450 litres | |
| Seat Exeo has 10 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`030 | 1`914 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 14 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Exeo has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |