Seat Exeo 2012 vs SAAB 9-3 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
| Seat Exeo engine produces 7 HP less power than SAAB 9-3, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite less power, Seat Exeo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Exeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Exeo consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-3, which means that by driving the Seat Exeo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Exeo consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-3. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.65 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 2.04 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.47 m | |
| Seat Exeo is 1 cm longer than the SAAB 9-3, 27 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Exeo is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 351 litres | |
|
Seat Exeo has more luggage capacity. Seat Exeo has 109 litres more trunk space than the SAAB 9-3. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`990 | 2`030 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Exeo has
|
| |