Seat Exeo 2012 vs Chevrolet Epica 2007
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 143 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 320 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
Seat Exeo engine produces 7 HP less power than Chevrolet Epica, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite less power, Seat Exeo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 6.1 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
The Seat Exeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Exeo consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Epica, which means that by driving the Seat Exeo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Exeo consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Epica. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 65 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1420 km in combined cycle | 1060 km in combined cycle | |
1160 km with real consumption | 940 km with real consumption | ||
Seat Exeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.66 m | 4.80 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.45 m | |
Seat Exeo is smaller. Seat Exeo is 14 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Epica, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Exeo is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 480 litres | |
Seat Exeo has 20 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Epica. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Seat Exeo is 0.4 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Epica. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`990 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | 2400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Exeo has
|
| |