Seat Exeo 2012 vs Chevrolet Epica 2007

 
Seat Exeo
2012 -
Chevrolet Epica
2007 - 2010
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 143 HP150 HP
Torque: 320 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.2 seconds9.7 seconds
Seat Exeo engine produces 7 HP less power than Chevrolet Epica, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite less power, Seat Exeo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.96.1
Real fuel consumption: 6.0 l/100km6.9 l/100km
The Seat Exeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Seat Exeo consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Epica, which means that by driving the Seat Exeo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Exeo consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Epica.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres65 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1420 km in combined cycle1060 km in combined cycle
1160 km with real consumption940 km with real consumption
Seat Exeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.66 m4.80 m
Width: 1.77 m1.81 m
Height: 1.43 m1.45 m
Seat Exeo is smaller.
Seat Exeo is 14 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Epica, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Exeo is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 460 litres480 litres
Seat Exeo has 20 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Epica.
Turning diameter: 11.2 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Exeo is 0.4 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Epica.
Gross weight (kg): 1`990no data
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average
no data
Average price (€): no data2400
Pros and Cons: Seat Exeo has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv