Seat Exeo 2012 vs SAAB 9-3 2010
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 120 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 250 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
SAAB 9-3 is a more dynamic driving. Seat Exeo engine produces 30 HP less power than SAAB 9-3, whereas torque is 70 NM less than SAAB 9-3. Due to the lower power, Seat Exeo reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 6.6 | |
The Seat Exeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Exeo consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-3, which means that by driving the Seat Exeo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.66 m | 4.65 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 2.04 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.47 m | |
Seat Exeo is 1 cm longer than the SAAB 9-3, 27 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Exeo is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 351 litres | |
Seat Exeo has more luggage capacity. Seat Exeo has 109 litres more trunk space than the SAAB 9-3. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`990 | 2`030 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | 4600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Exeo has
|
SAAB 9-3 has
| |