Seat Exeo 2012 vs SAAB 9-3 2010
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 120 HP | 122 HP | |
Torque: | 230 NM | 167 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
Seat Exeo is more dynamic to drive. Seat Exeo engine produces 2 HP less power than SAAB 9-3, but torque is 63 NM more than SAAB 9-3. Despite less power, Seat Exeo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 7.7 | |
The Seat Exeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Exeo consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-3, which means that by driving the Seat Exeo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.66 m | 4.65 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 2.04 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.47 m | |
Seat Exeo is 1 cm longer than the SAAB 9-3, 27 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Exeo is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 351 litres | |
Seat Exeo has more luggage capacity. Seat Exeo has 109 litres more trunk space than the SAAB 9-3. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`980 | 1`910 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | 4600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Exeo has
|
| |