Seat Exeo 2012 vs Mazda 3 2019
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 213 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
Mazda 3 is a more dynamic driving. Seat Exeo engine produces 2 HP less power than Mazda 3, but torque is 17 NM more than Mazda 3. Due to the lower power, Seat Exeo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 5.1 | |
|
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Exeo consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Exeo could require 330 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Exeo and Mazda 3 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 450 litres | |
| Seat Exeo has 10 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`980 | 1`869 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 14 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Exeo has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |