Seat Exeo 2011 vs Lexus IS 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 208 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 252 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
|
Lexus IS is a more dynamic driving. Seat Exeo engine produces 88 HP less power than Lexus IS, whereas torque is 22 NM less than Lexus IS. Due to the lower power, Seat Exeo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 9.1 | |
|
The Seat Exeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Exeo consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Lexus IS, which means that by driving the Seat Exeo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| Seat Exeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Seat Exeo) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Lexus IS) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Audi A4 | Used also on Lexus GS | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Lexus IS might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.43 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Exeo is 8 cm longer than the Lexus IS, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 378 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
833 litres | no data | |
|
Seat Exeo has more luggage capacity. Seat Exeo has 82 litres more trunk space than the Lexus IS. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Exeo is 1 metres more than that of the Lexus IS, which means Seat Exeo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`980 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Exeo has
|
Lexus IS has
| |