Seat Exeo 2011 vs Jaguar XE 2019
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 365 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 6.5 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XE is a more dynamic driving. Seat Exeo engine produces 130 HP less power than Jaguar XE, whereas torque is 135 NM less than Jaguar XE. Due to the lower power, Seat Exeo reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 7.0 | |
| Seat Exeo consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XE, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Exeo could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| Seat Exeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Seat Exeo) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XE) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 370'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Audi A4 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jaguar F-Type, Jaguar XF, Jaguar E-Pace | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jaguar XE might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.68 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.42 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
833 litres | no data | |
|
Seat Exeo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Jaguar XE may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Exeo is 0.1 metres less than that of the Jaguar XE. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`980 kg | 2`150 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`420 kg | 1`536 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 560 kg | 614 kg | |
| Seat Exeo load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 10 procentiem less than Jaguar XE. Therefore, Jaguar XE is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 22 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Exeo has
|
Jaguar XE has
| |