Seat Exeo 2012 vs Jaguar XE 2019
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 5.9 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XE is a more dynamic driving. Seat Exeo engine produces 180 HP less power than Jaguar XE, whereas torque is 170 NM less than Jaguar XE. Due to the lower power, Seat Exeo reaches 100 km/h speed 4.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 6.7 | |
|
The Jaguar XE is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Exeo consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XE, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Exeo could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 56 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| Seat Exeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Seat Exeo) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XE) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 370'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Audi A4 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jaguar F-Type, Jaguar XF, Jaguar E-Pace | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jaguar XE might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Seat Exeo is smaller, but slightly higher. Seat Exeo is 1 cm shorter than the Jaguar XE, 8 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 410 litres | |
|
Seat Exeo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Seat Exeo has 50 litres more trunk space than the Jaguar XE. The Jaguar XE may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`980 | 2`160 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 22 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Exeo has
|
Jaguar XE has
| |