Seat Exeo 2012 vs Chevrolet Epica 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 141 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Epica is a more dynamic driving. Seat Exeo engine produces 21 HP less power than Chevrolet Epica, but torque is 35 NM more than Chevrolet Epica. Due to the lower power, Seat Exeo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 8.2 | |
|
The Seat Exeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Exeo consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Epica, which means that by driving the Seat Exeo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| Seat Exeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 370'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Audi A4 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Seat Exeo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Seat Exeo is smaller. Seat Exeo is 14 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Epica, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Exeo is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 480 litres | |
| Seat Exeo has 20 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Epica. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Exeo is 0.4 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Epica. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`980 | 1`985 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Exeo has
|
Chevrolet Epica has
| |