Seat Exeo 2009 vs Seat Exeo 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 211 HP | 210 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
|
Seat Exeo 2012 is a more dynamic driving. Seat Exeo 2009 engine produces 1 HP more power than Seat Exeo 2012, but torque is 40 NM less than Seat Exeo 2012. Despite the higher power, Seat Exeo 2009 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 7.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.2 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Exeo 2012 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Exeo 2009 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Exeo 2012, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Exeo 2009 could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Exeo 2009 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Exeo 2012. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1160 km on highway | 1290 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Exeo 2012 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Exeo 2009 and Seat Exeo 2012 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 442 litres | 442 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Exeo has
|
Seat Exeo has
| |