Seat Exeo 2009 vs Kia Ceed 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 211 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 186 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Seat Exeo is more dynamic to drive. Seat Exeo engine produces 68 HP more power than Kia Ceed, whereas torque is 94 NM more than Kia Ceed. Thanks to more power Seat Exeo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.2 l/100km | 9.3 l/100km | |
|
By specification Seat Exeo consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Exeo could require 105 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Seat Exeo consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 1160 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Exeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Kia Ceed 2009 2.0 engine: Relatively reliable engine with a large resource. Can have inherent vibrations and is noisier than a typical petrol engine. Spare parts widely available. May have problems with ignition system and temperature ... More about Kia Ceed 2009 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.53 m | |
| Seat Exeo is 18 cm longer than the Kia Ceed, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Exeo is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 442 litres | 534 litres | |
|
Kia Ceed has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Seat Exeo has 92 litres less trunk space than the Kia Ceed. This could mean that the Seat Exeo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.3 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 1`890 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Seat Exeo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Ceed has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Seat Exeo, so Seat Exeo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Exeo has
|
Kia Ceed has
| |