Seat Exeo 2009 vs Volkswagen Golf 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Golf is a more dynamic driving. Seat Exeo engine produces 7 HP less power than Volkswagen Golf, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Seat Exeo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Golf is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Exeo consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Exeo could require 225 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Exeo consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1220 km in combined cycle | 1190 km in combined cycle | |
| 1550 km on highway | 1350 km on highway | ||
| 1120 km with real consumption | 890 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Seat Exeo 2009 2.0 engine: This diesel engine is essentially a more efficient version of the well-known CAGA engine. The life of its piezo injectors depends heavily on the quality of the fuel used.
The timing belt is replaced at ... More about Seat Exeo 2009 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.48 m | |
| Seat Exeo is 11 cm longer than the Volkswagen Golf, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Exeo is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 442 litres | 605 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1620 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Golf has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Seat Exeo has 163 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Golf. This could mean that the Seat Exeo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Exeo is 0.3 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Golf. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 1`970 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Volkswagen Golf has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Exeo has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Volkswagen Golf, so Volkswagen Golf quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 8800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Exeo has
|
Volkswagen Golf has
| |