Seat Exeo 2009 vs SAAB 9-3 2007

 
Seat Exeo
2009 - 2012
SAAB 9-3
2007 - 2010
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 143 HP200 HP
Torque: 320 NM300 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.6 seconds8.1 seconds
SAAB 9-3 is a more dynamic driving.
Seat Exeo engine produces 57 HP less power than SAAB 9-3, but torque is 20 NM more than SAAB 9-3. Due to the lower power, Seat Exeo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.78.3
The Seat Exeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Seat Exeo consumes 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-3, which means that by driving the Seat Exeo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 390 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres58 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1220 km in combined cycle690 km in combined cycle
Seat Exeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Seat Exeo 2009 2.0 engine: This diesel engine is essentially a more efficient version of the well-known CAGA engine. The life of its piezo injectors depends heavily on the quality of the fuel used. The timing belt is replaced at ...  More about Seat Exeo 2009 2.0 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.67 m4.67 m
Width: 1.77 m1.76 m
Height: 1.43 m1.50 m
Seat Exeo and SAAB 9-3 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 442 litres419 litres
Seat Exeo has more luggage capacity.
Seat Exeo has 23 litres more trunk space than the SAAB 9-3.
Turning diameter: 11.2 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Exeo is 0.4 metres more than that of the SAAB 9-3.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0501`600
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

high
Average price (€): 44002800
Pros and Cons: Seat Exeo has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
SAAB 9-3 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv