Seat Exeo 2009 vs Kia Ceed 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 304 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Seat Exeo is more dynamic to drive. Seat Exeo engine produces 3 HP more power than Kia Ceed, whereas torque is 16 NM more than Kia Ceed. Thanks to more power Seat Exeo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 5.5 | |
| Seat Exeo consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Exeo could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1220 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 1550 km on highway | 1170 km on highway | ||
| Seat Exeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Audi A4 | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Hyundai Santa FE, Kia Sportage, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Tucson | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Ceed might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Seat Exeo 2009 2.0 engine: This diesel engine is essentially a more efficient version of the well-known CAGA engine. The life of its piezo injectors depends heavily on the quality of the fuel used.
The timing belt is replaced at ... More about Seat Exeo 2009 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.53 m | |
| Seat Exeo is 18 cm longer than the Kia Ceed, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Exeo is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 442 litres | 534 litres | |
|
Kia Ceed has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Seat Exeo has 92 litres less trunk space than the Kia Ceed. This could mean that the Seat Exeo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Exeo is 0.9 metres more than that of the Kia Ceed, which means Seat Exeo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 1`970 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Seat Exeo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Ceed has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Seat Exeo, so Seat Exeo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Exeo has
|
Kia Ceed has
| |