Seat Exeo 2009 vs SAAB 9-3 2007
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 120 HP | 200 HP | |
Torque: | 290 NM | 300 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
SAAB 9-3 is a more dynamic driving. Seat Exeo engine produces 80 HP less power than SAAB 9-3, whereas torque is 10 NM less than SAAB 9-3. Due to the lower power, Seat Exeo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 8.3 | |
The Seat Exeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Exeo consumes 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-3, which means that by driving the Seat Exeo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 390 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 58 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1220 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
Seat Exeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.67 m | 4.67 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.50 m | |
Seat Exeo and SAAB 9-3 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 442 litres | 419 litres | |
Seat Exeo has more luggage capacity. Seat Exeo has 23 litres more trunk space than the SAAB 9-3. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 1`600 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | high | |
Average price (€): | 4400 | 2800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Exeo has
|
SAAB 9-3 has
| |