Seat Exeo 2009 vs SAAB 9-3 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 290 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
| Seat Exeo engine produces 30 HP less power than SAAB 9-3, whereas torque is 30 NM less than SAAB 9-3. Despite less power, Seat Exeo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Exeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Exeo consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-3, which means that by driving the Seat Exeo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Exeo consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-3. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1220 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 1120 km with real consumption | 870 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Exeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.50 m | |
| Seat Exeo and SAAB 9-3 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 442 litres | 419 litres | |
|
Seat Exeo has more luggage capacity. Seat Exeo has 23 litres more trunk space than the SAAB 9-3. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Exeo has
|
SAAB 9-3 has
| |