Seat Exeo 2009 vs Mazda 6 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 290 NM | 330 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Mazda 6 is a more dynamic driving. Seat Exeo engine produces 20 HP less power than Mazda 6, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Mazda 6. Due to the lower power, Seat Exeo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Exeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Exeo consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6, which means that by driving the Seat Exeo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Exeo consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1220 km in combined cycle | 1060 km in combined cycle | |
| 1550 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
| 1120 km with real consumption | 960 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Exeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Exeo is 4 cm shorter than the Mazda 6, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Exeo is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 442 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1751 litres | |
|
Mazda 6 has more luggage space. Seat Exeo has 63 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 6. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 2`110 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Mazda 6 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Mazda 6 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Exeo has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Mazda 6, so Mazda 6 quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Exeo has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |