Seat Exeo 2009 vs Kia Ceed 2009

 
Seat Exeo
2009 - 2012
Kia Ceed
2009 - 2012
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 120 HP140 HP
Torque: 290 NM304 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.9 seconds10.5 seconds
Kia Ceed is a more dynamic driving.
Seat Exeo engine produces 20 HP less power than Kia Ceed, whereas torque is 14 NM less than Kia Ceed. Due to the lower power, Seat Exeo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.75.5
Seat Exeo consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Exeo could require 30 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres53 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1220 km in combined cycle960 km in combined cycle
1550 km on highway1170 km on highway
Seat Exeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.67 m4.49 m
Width: 1.77 m1.79 m
Height: 1.43 m1.53 m
Seat Exeo is 18 cm longer than the Kia Ceed, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Exeo is 10 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 442 litres534 litres
Kia Ceed has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Seat Exeo has 92 litres less trunk space than the Kia Ceed. This could mean that the Seat Exeo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: no data10.3 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`0501`970
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

below average
Seat Exeo has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Kia Ceed has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Seat Exeo, so Seat Exeo quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 44003200
Pros and Cons: Seat Exeo has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
Kia Ceed has
  • more power
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv