Seat Exeo 2009 vs Kia Ceed 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 304 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Seat Exeo is more dynamic to drive. Seat Exeo engine produces 30 HP more power than Kia Ceed, whereas torque is 46 NM more than Kia Ceed. Thanks to more power Seat Exeo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 5.5 | |
|
The Kia Ceed is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Exeo consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Exeo could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1180 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 1520 km on highway | 1170 km on highway | ||
| Seat Exeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Audi A4, Seat Altea, Audi A5, Audi Q5, Seat Leon | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Hyundai Santa FE, Kia Sportage, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Tucson | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Ceed might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.53 m | |
| Seat Exeo is 18 cm longer than the Kia Ceed, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Exeo is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 442 litres | 534 litres | |
|
Kia Ceed has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Seat Exeo has 92 litres less trunk space than the Kia Ceed. This could mean that the Seat Exeo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.3 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`075 | 1`970 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Seat Exeo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Ceed has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Seat Exeo, so Seat Exeo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Exeo has
|
Kia Ceed has
| |