Seat Exeo 2012 vs Seat Exeo 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 210 HP | 211 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
|
Seat Exeo 2012 is more dynamic to drive. Seat Exeo 2012 engine produces 1 HP less power than Seat Exeo 2009, but torque is 40 NM more than Seat Exeo 2009. Despite less power, Seat Exeo 2012 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 7.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.1 l/100km | 9.2 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Exeo 2012 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Exeo 2012 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Exeo 2009, which means that by driving the Seat Exeo 2012 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Exeo 2012 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Exeo 2009. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 1290 km on highway | 1160 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Exeo 2012 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.43 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Exeo 2012 and Seat Exeo 2009 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 442 litres | 442 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Exeo has
|
Seat Exeo has
| |