Seat Exeo 2012 vs Jaguar XF 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 210 HP | 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 365 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 seconds | 7.1 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XF is a more dynamic driving. Seat Exeo engine produces 40 HP less power than Jaguar XF, whereas torque is 45 NM less than Jaguar XF. Due to the lower power, Seat Exeo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 6.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.1 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Exeo is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Seat Exeo consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XF, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Exeo could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Seat Exeo consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XF. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 1290 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 570 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Exeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Seat Exeo) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XF) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Seat Exeo is smaller. Seat Exeo is 29 cm shorter than the Jaguar XF, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Exeo is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 442 litres | 565 litres | |
|
Jaguar XF has more luggage space. Seat Exeo has 123 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar XF. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Exeo is 0.4 metres less than that of the Jaguar XF, which means Seat Exeo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 2`290 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 14 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Exeo has
|
Jaguar XF has
| |