Seat Exeo 2012 vs Volvo V60 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | 7.7 seconds | |
| Seat Exeo engine produces 40 HP less power than Volvo V60, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Volvo V60. Despite less power, Seat Exeo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 8.3 | |
|
The Seat Exeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Exeo consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V60, which means that by driving the Seat Exeo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 67 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 1160 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| Seat Exeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.48 m | |
| Seat Exeo is 4 cm longer than the Volvo V60, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Exeo is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 442 litres | 430 litres | |
| Seat Exeo has 12 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V60. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Exeo is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volvo V60. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 2`130 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Exeo has
|
Volvo V60 has
| |