Seat Exeo 2012 vs Volvo V60 2013

	Seat Exeo 2012 -	Volvo V60 2013 - 2018
Gearbox:	Manual	Automatic
Engine:	2.0 Diesel	2.0 Diesel
Performance
Power:	170 HP	163 HP
Torque:	350 NM	400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h:	8.6 seconds	9.4 seconds
	Seat Exeo is more dynamic to drive. Seat Exeo engine produces 7 HP more power than Volvo V60, but torque is 50 NM less than Volvo V60. Thanks to more power Seat Exeo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster.
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):	5.4	4.9
	The Volvo V60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Exeo consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Exeo could require 75 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity:	70 litres	68 litres
Full fuel tank distance:	1290 km in combined cycle	1380 km in combined cycle
	1590 km on highway	1580 km on highway
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions
Length:	4.67 m	4.63 m
Width:	1.77 m	1.87 m
Height:	1.45 m	1.48 m
	Seat Exeo is 4 cm longer than the Volvo V60, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Exeo is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity:	442 litres	430 litres
	Seat Exeo has 12 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V60.
Turning diameter:	11.2 meters	11.3 meters
	The turning circle of the Seat Exeo is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo V60.
Gross weight (kg):	2`075	2`200

Safety:	no data	no data
Quality:	average	average
Average price (€):	5800	12 800
Pros and Cons:	Seat Exeo has more dynamic lower price	Volvo V60 has lower fuel consumption fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail Facebook Twitter e-mail

Seat Exeo 2012 vs Volvo V60 2013

Performance

Fuel consumption

Dimensions