Seat Exeo 2012 vs Seat Exeo 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
| Seat Exeo 2012 and Seat Exeo 2009 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 5.9 | |
|
The Seat Exeo 2012 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Exeo 2012 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Exeo 2009, which means that by driving the Seat Exeo 2012 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1290 km in combined cycle | 1180 km in combined cycle | |
| 1590 km on highway | 1520 km on highway | ||
| Seat Exeo 2012 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 5 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.43 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Exeo 2012 and Seat Exeo 2009 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 442 litres | 442 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`075 | 2`075 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Exeo has
|
Seat Exeo has
| |