Seat Exeo 2011 vs Volvo V60 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Volvo V60 is a more dynamic driving. Seat Exeo engine produces 20 HP less power than Volvo V60, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Volvo V60. Due to the lower power, Seat Exeo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 4.9 | |
|
The Volvo V60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Exeo consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Exeo could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1270 km in combined cycle | 1380 km in combined cycle | |
| 1520 km on highway | 1580 km on highway | ||
| Volvo V60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.48 m | |
| Seat Exeo is 4 cm longer than the Volvo V60, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Exeo is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 422 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1354 litres | no data | |
| Despite its longer length, Seat Exeo has 8 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V60. This could mean that the Seat Exeo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Exeo is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo V60. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`090 | 2`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 12 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Exeo has
|
Volvo V60 has
| |