Seat Exeo 2012 vs SAAB 9-5 2005

 
Seat Exeo
2012 -
SAAB 9-5
2005 - 2010
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel1.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 143 HP150 HP
Torque: 320 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.6 seconds10.7 seconds
Seat Exeo engine produces 7 HP less power than SAAB 9-5, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite less power, Seat Exeo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.06.7
Real fuel consumption: 6.0 l/100km6.4 l/100km
The Seat Exeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Seat Exeo consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-5, which means that by driving the Seat Exeo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Exeo consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-5.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres75 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1400 km in combined cycle1110 km in combined cycle
1160 km with real consumption1170 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.67 m4.84 m
Width: 1.77 m1.79 m
Height: 1.45 m1.46 m
Seat Exeo is smaller.
Seat Exeo is 17 cm shorter than the SAAB 9-5, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 442 litres416 litres
Seat Exeo has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Seat Exeo has 26 litres more trunk space than the SAAB 9-5. The SAAB 9-5 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 11.2 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Exeo is 0.4 metres more than that of the SAAB 9-5.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0501`800
Safety: no data
Quality:
average
no data
Average price (€): 64002200
Pros and Cons: Seat Exeo has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
SAAB 9-5 has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv