Seat Exeo 2012 vs Volvo V60 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Volvo V60 is a more dynamic driving. Seat Exeo engine produces 20 HP less power than Volvo V60, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Volvo V60. Due to the lower power, Seat Exeo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Exeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Exeo consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V60, which means that by driving the Seat Exeo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Exeo consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 67 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1400 km in combined cycle | 1210 km in combined cycle | |
| 1660 km on highway | 1520 km on highway | ||
| 1160 km with real consumption | 1030 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Exeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.48 m | |
| Seat Exeo is 4 cm longer than the Volvo V60, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Exeo is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 442 litres | 430 litres | |
| Seat Exeo has 12 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V60. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Exeo is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volvo V60. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 2`090 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Exeo has
|
Volvo V60 has
| |