Seat Exeo 2012 vs Seat Exeo 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
|
Seat Exeo 2009 is a more dynamic driving. Seat Exeo 2012 engine produces 27 HP less power than Seat Exeo 2009, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Seat Exeo 2009. Due to the lower power, Seat Exeo 2012 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Exeo 2012 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Exeo 2012 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Exeo 2009, which means that by driving the Seat Exeo 2012 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Exeo 2012 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Exeo 2009. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1400 km in combined cycle | 1180 km in combined cycle | |
| 1660 km on highway | 1520 km on highway | ||
| 1160 km with real consumption | 1040 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Exeo 2012 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.43 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Exeo 2012 and Seat Exeo 2009 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 442 litres | 442 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 2`075 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Exeo has
|
Seat Exeo has
| |